Boston, MA
Legal Strategy + Operational Restrictions
What Happened
Boston responded with strong executive action focused on restricting enforcement operations and increasing oversight.
What They Did
- Issued an executive order blocking use of city property for enforcement staging
- Directed regular FOIA requests to track federal enforcement activity
- Required production of evidence (e.g., body cam footage) in certain cases
- Coordinated messaging with regional leaders
Key Takeaway
Use legal tools + transparency + oversight to push back and maintain accountability.
Portland, OR
Policy Clarity + System Design
What Happened
Portland focused on building clear structural systems to manage and limit federal enforcement interactions within city operations.
What They Did
- Passed a resolution establishing the Protect Portland Initiative
- Required identification and labeling of non-public areas in city buildings
- Developed policies guiding how staff interact with federal agents
- Invested in a centralized, multilingual public information hub
- Coordinated with state leadership on legal action
Key Takeaway
Clarity and consistency matter — define spaces, define rules, and build systems staff can follow.
Santa Ana, CA
Direct Financial + Legal Support
What Happened
Santa Ana focused on immediate support for residents impacted by enforcement activity.
What They Did
- Created an emergency financial assistance program for affected households
- Provided support for:
- Rent
- Utilities
- Allocated funding for immigration legal services
- Partnered with legal organizations for service delivery
Key Takeaway
Direct financial and legal support helps stabilize communities during periods of enforcement activity.
New Orleans, LA
Oversight + Federal Accountability
What Happened
New Orleans leaders responded by demanding transparency and accountability from federal agencies.
What They Did
- Sent formal requests to federal agencies for:
- Arrest data
- Due process protections
- Officer identification requirements
- Launched a public reporting portal for rights violations
- Pushed for oversight and documentation of enforcement practices
Key Takeaway
Local governments can use oversight, data requests, and documentation to hold federal agencies accountable.
San Diego County, CA
Facility Access Control + Policy Clarity
What Happened
San Diego County focused on clarifying rules around access to government facilities.
What They Did
- Advanced policy to restrict entry into non-public areas without a judicial warrant
- Planned multilingual signage to reinforce access rules
- Developed formal ordinance language to clarify enforcement boundaries
Key Takeaway
Clear definitions of public vs. non-public space are critical for enforcement control.
San Francisco, CA
Centralized Public Resource Hub
What Happened
San Francisco focused on making services and information easily accessible through a centralized platform.
What They Did
- Launched the SF Immigrant Forum, a centralized public resource hub
- Connected residents to:
- Legal services
- Financial assistance
- Healthcare
- Coordinated across multiple city departments
- Integrated access to a community-run rapid response hotline
Key Takeaway
Centralized, multilingual platforms make support accessible, scalable, and coordinated.
Seattle, WA
Coordinated Government Response
What Happened
Seattle prepared for potential federal deployment and increased enforcement activity by focusing on internal coordination and operational readiness.
What They Did
- Established a citywide Resilience Task Force to coordinate response
- Required training for all city employees on enforcement protocols
- Reinforced local police independence from federal authorities
- Implemented daily reporting systems on federal activity
Key Takeaway
Strong responses require internal coordination + clear reporting + staff readiness.
Chicago, IL
Citywide Protection + Public Awareness
What Happened
Chicago anticipated increased federal immigration enforcement activity and moved to proactively protect residents through both policy and public education.
What They Did
- Issued an executive order establishing an “ICE Free Zone”, prohibiting use of city property for enforcement
- Launched a Know Your Rights (KYR) public campaign across transit systems
- Distributed signage and guidance limiting access to non-public areas
- Reinforced local police independence and operational clarity
Key Takeaway
Combine policy + public education + visibility. Chicago didn’t just pass rules — they made sure residents knew them.

