USCIS narrows who may and may not obtain a green card in the U.S.

USCIS-greencard-policy-image
On May 21, 2026, USCIS issued Policy Memorandum PM-602-0199  stating that it will grant adjustment of status only as an “extraordinary” act of discretion in exceptional cases.  Furthermore, that “Congress expects aliens paroled into the United States or admitted into the United States as nonimmigrants to depart rather than pursue adjustment of status. Such aliens are generally expected to pursue an immigrant visa and admission from outside the United States “
While the policy does not impact refugees’ and asylees’ eligibility to apply for adjustment, parolees – as nonimmigrants – are specifically targeted:
With limited exceptions, the statutory scheme suggests that Congress expects aliens paroled into the United States or admitted into the United States as nonimmigrants to depart rather than pursue adjustment of status. Such aliens are generally expected to pursue an immigrant visa and admission from outside the United States.
Additionally, applicants who are permitted to adjust while in the United States will have added difficulty obtaining approvals.  The policy describes adjustment as being an “extraordinary act of administrative grace” and “extraordinary relief.”  Officers are ordered to “consider all relevant factors and information in the totality of the circumstances in exercising that discretion.”  The language of the policy makes application approval the undesired exception and expects that denials will be the norm.

Several details are unclear, including how the policy will be implemented, and whether the policy be retroactive and impact pending applications for adjustment.  Details will be released as soon as they are obtained.

English-only analysis — translations soon!
Read full article at nytimes.com
Siren icon

Medicaid and CHIP eligibility changes

Source: CWS
See here for a new unbranded resource for state policymakers that provides much, much more detail on what the Medicaid and CHIP eligibility changes will mean, who will be impacted, and why states should avoid rushing implementation of changes and risk improperly cutting off still-eligible recipients. The resource specifically calls on states to: 
  • Use their full implementation window to ensure affected beneficiaries are correctly identified and not improperly cut off. 
  • Ensure previously eligible refugees, asylees, victims of trafficking, and others are considered under alternatives like CHIPRA and FCEP to preserve coverage.  
  • Expand or establish state-funded coverage programs and the use of CHIP Health Services Initiatives (HSIs), CHIPRA, and FCEP to protect access to affordable healthcare for refugees who are impacted.  
  • Push for the expansion of Refugee Cash and Medical Assistance to 24 months (The Refugee Act authorizes up to 36 months, but RCA/RMA was most recently reduced to 4 months by the Trump administration in 2025).  

Emergency Response Protocol for Immigration Enforcement Activity

Clear, immediate steps for local government staff and officials when federal immigration enforcement activity occurs in or around city facilities.

This protocol outlines how local governments can respond in a coordinated, lawful, and consistent manner when federal immigration agents are present. It is designed to help staff act quickly, follow established procedures, and maintain access to public services while protecting the integrity of local operations.

If federal agents are present:

Verify warrant type

Confirm whether agents have a valid judicial warrant before allowing access beyond public areas.

Document all interactions

Record names, agencies, badge numbers, time, and actions taken.

Do not allow access to non-public areas

Limit access to restricted spaces unless proper legal authorization is provided.

Contact legal counsel

Notify the city attorney or designated legal authority for guidance.

Activate internal protocol

Alert department leadership and follow established procedures.

FACILITY RESPONSE PROTOCOLS

When Agents Arrive at a City Facility

  • Direct all agents to a public reception area
  • Request identification and agency information
  • Do not grant access to non-public areas without a judicial warrant
  • Do not allow use of city property for staging or operations
  • Follow internal escalation procedures immediately

Facility Preparedness (Pre-Event)

  • Clearly define public vs. non-public areas in all facilities
  • Post signage indicating restricted access zones
  • Ensure staff understand who has authority to grant access
  • Identify high-risk locations (schools, health centers, etc.)

STAFF RESPONSE & TRAINING

Staff Responsibilities

  • Follow established protocols at all times
  • Do not make independent legal decisions
  • Refer all enforcement requests to supervisors or legal counsel
  • Maintain professionalism and consistency

Training Priorities

Local governments should ensure that frontline staff are trained in:

  • Access control procedures
  • Escalation and reporting protocols
  • Documentation requirements
  • Communication expectations

Consistent training ensures uniform response across departments and locations.

LAW ENFORCEMENT COORDINATION

Local Law Enforcement Role

  • Maintain independence from federal enforcement operations
  • Follow local policies and constitutional requirements
  • Coordinate with city leadership and legal counsel

Key Practices

  • Clearly identify officers at all times
  • Use body cameras where required
  • Document all interactions with federal agents
  • Maintain transparency and accountability

Local jurisdictions may establish additional guidance for how police interact with federal agencies during enforcement activity.

DOCUMENTATION & ACCOUNTABILITY

What to Document

  • Agency involved
  • Names and badge numbers
  • Date, time, and location
  • Nature of the interaction
  • Any requests made by federal agents

Why Documentation Matters

  • Supports legal review and oversight
  • Helps identify patterns of activity
  • Protects both staff and residents
  • Enables coordination across agencies

Some jurisdictions have established reporting systems and documentation protocols to support legal action and accountability efforts.

COMMUNICATIONS

Internal Communication

  • Notify leadership immediately
  • Coordinate across departments
  • Ensure consistent messaging internally

Public Communication

  • Provide timely, accurate updates
  • Avoid speculation or unverified information
  • Coordinate with trusted community partners
  • Prepare for media inquiries if necessary

Local governments may need to conduct rapid communication efforts during active enforcement situations.

Source: Local government actions and response strategies compiled from multiple jurisdictions as of March 2026.

digital-tool-icon

Immigration Data by State and City: Map the Impact Tool

Overview

The American Immigration Council Map the Impact tool provides detailed, location-based data on immigrant populations and their contributions across the United States.


What You Can Find

  • Population data by state and county
  • Taxes paid and spending power
  • Workforce participation
  • Business ownership and entrepreneurship

Why This Matters

This data helps local governments, organizations, and advocates better understand the role immigrants play in their communities and supports informed policy and planning decisions.

map-the-impact-immigration-tool


Access the Tool

Legal Scale - Policy icn

Operation PARRIS & Refugee Detention: What to Know

What’s Happening

The Trump administration has launched a sweeping campaign banning refugees stranded abroad and targeting refugees admitted through the U.S. resettlement program, sparking legal challenges.

Key Developments

  • Executive order halting refugee admissions
  • Launch of Operation PARRIS
  • Arrests and detention of refugees
  • Court rulings blocking parts of enforcement

Why This Matters

  • Impacts lawfully present refugees
  • Signals expanded federal enforcement scope
  • Creates uncertainty for communities and service providers

What People Should Know

  • Interviews may function as re-vetting
    Adjustment of status timing matters
    Legal challenges are ongoing

View RCUSA article

immigration-status-chart

TPS and Humanitarian Parole Status Updates (EAD Eligibility Chart)

Overview

This chart provides up-to-date information on Temporary Protected Status (TPS) and humanitarian parole programs, including current status and employment authorization eligibility.


What This Covers

  • Current TPS designations
  • Humanitarian parole program updates
  • Employment Authorization Document (EAD) notes
  • Program-specific status changes

Why This Matters

Eligibility and work authorization rules can change frequently. This chart helps individuals, employers, and service providers stay informed and make timely decisions.


Access the Full Chart

 

View Chart at AILA

Legal Scale - Policy icn

Legal Practitioner Toolkit for Refugee Revetting

IRAP LOGO

IRAP shares a toolkit for legal practitioners who are preparing clients in refugee status for refugee revetting or adjustment of status interviews, or who are representing clients who receive a Notice of Intent to Terminate (NOIT) their refugee status. The toolkit contains: 1) brief legal background; 2) practice tips and recommendations for each stage of the process; 3) a step-by-step checklist; 4) sample scripts for interview preparation; 5) resources for challenging NOITs; and 6) additional legal resources on refugee claims and refugee processing.

For impacted communities, we recommend consulting and sharing IRAP’s legal information resources on refugee detention and revetting that are available in English, Amharic, Arabic, Dari/Farsi, French, Haitian Kreyol, Pashto, Portuguese, Russian, Somali, Spanish, Swahili, Tigrinya, and Ukrainian, and contain information on requesting legal assistance.

community-support-icon

Community Support Toolkit

1. Volunteer through IRIS Community Partners 

IRIS has created the ICP program to address reduced staffing and rising client needs. Volunteers choose a support area—such as education, childcare, or administrative tasks— and can work in person or remotely. The program is led by experienced team leaders and is flexible for both individuals and groups. 

To join, apply via the IRIS Community Partner form online. All volunteers must complete a background check and attend a brief virtual orientation before accepting tasks

3. Invite IRIS to Speak to Your Community

IRIS regularly participates in virtual and in‑person speaking engagements, communityupdates, and educational events focused on the impact of immigration. We welcomeinvitations from schools and universities, faith communities, and other civic or professionalorganizations. Presentations often feature both IRIS program staff and clients or formerclients who share personal stories of displacement and resettlement.

To request a speaker, complete the IRIS Speaker Request form online

4. Help Amplify IRIS’ Message 

IRIS encourages supporters to engage with and share their content; helping us expand reach, especially during this time of limited resources. 

  • Like, share and comment on our social media posts 
  • Write an Op Ed for your local newspaper 
  • Share upcoming events and updates with your networks 
  • Help us distribute informational and educational materials 
  • Encourage others to tune in to our virtual public community updates 

5. Organize In-Kind Donation Drives 

IRIS invites supporters to organize local in‑kind donation drives—especially for school supplies, personal care products, and cold weather gear—that directly support refugee and immigrant families. Schools, faith groups, and workplaces can host a drive by creating and circulating a flier (online and in person) and setting a clear end date.

Once collected, please deliver the requested items to the IRIS Warehouse at 75 Hamilton Street in New Haven on Monday mornings or by appointment. We’re happy to take photos and give your group a shout‑out on social media!

6. Plan or Host a Fundraiser 

volunteers-for-immigrants-illustration

Planning and coordinating a fundraiser is a great way that individuals and groups can help sustain our work. 

  • Host a community fundraiser (in-person or virtual) 
  • Organize a benefit event through your school, workplace or faith group 
  • Designate a day and/or portion of your business’ proceeds to IRIS 
  • Start organizing your fundraising team for our annual Run for Refugees! 

7. Use our Interpretation and Translation Services

IRIS Interpretation & Translation Services provide professional, culturally responsive language access to help people communicate clearly and with dignity. These servicesremove language barriers while directly supporting IRIS’s mission to empower refugees and immigrants, offered at below market rates. Services include: 

Interpretation (in‑person, phone, and video) in 300+ languages, available 24/7 through trained, community‑rooted interpreters.

Written translation for individuals and organizations, including certified and notarized documents for immigration, legal, health, education, and personal needs.

For questions about any of these giving options, please contact translations@irisct.org.

8. Support IRIS Through Purchases on our Merch Store

Support IRIS by purchasing and promoting IRIS merchandise—every item you buy providesfinancial support while increasing visibility for the organization. You can shop the merch store online here. Consider showing your support by buying and wearing IRIS gear,encouraging group or bulk orders for your team or upcoming events, or even creating abasket of IRIS‑branded items to raffle at your next gathering.

9. Connect Us with Your Community Resources 

Please feel free to recommend anyone in your network who may be able to support our work. This could include friends, family members, professional contacts, or neighbors. We would be especially grateful for referrals to:

  • Landlords who may be open to renting to our clients
  • Employers who might consider hiring our clients
  • Refugee- or immigrant‑owned businesses or artists whom we could help promoteand support
  • Retired immigration attorneys who are interested in volunteering their time to assist

Guide for Youth Groups & Schools 

Ages 17 & under – always with adult supervision! 

School-Wide Fundraisers – Bake sales, snack stands, hot chocolate tables, talent shows or student showcases with optional donations, Spirit Week fundraisers 

Event-Based Fundraising Charity sports matches, art sales featuring student artwork, community yard sale or swap meet organized by a club 

Digital & Peer-to-Peer Fundraising Classroom or club online fundraising pages, goal-based challenges for different grades or classrooms 

School Awareness Campaigns Social media takeovers, poster campaigns, student newsletter or school newspaper feature about IRIS 

Educational Engagement Classroom presentations, film screenings and guided discussions about global migration, human rights or displacement 

Community-Uniting Events Cultural fairs celebrating global diversity, food festival featuring recipes from students’ families, “Welcome Week” where students promote kindness and inclusion 

Hands-On Volunteering Assembling at-home or hygiene kits at school, assemble activity kits with puzzles and games for IRIS youth) 

Student Ambassadors & Clubs Form an IRIS Student Club focused on inclusion, service and education 

Annual School Traditions Yearly coat drives, yearly team for IRIS’s annual Run for Refugees, annual film screenings & discussions, service projects tied to a particular curriculum 

CT-Atty-General-Tong-immigration-policy

Attorney General Tong Issues Statement of Policy and Guidance Regarding Immigration Matters

(Hartford, CT) – Attorney General William Tong today released a statement of policy and guidance regarding immigration law and related legal matters, proceedings and enforcement actions to provide clarity and guidance as to the state’s legal position on these matters.

“I write this memorandum as Connecticut’s Chief Legal Officer and Chief civil law enforcement official. I also write this memorandum as a son and grandson of immigrants and refugees, born a citizen by right of my birth on American soil, like millions of other Americans and Connecticut residents. A year ago, it would have been hard to imagine U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) occupying American cities like a masked paramilitary force, ripping parents from their children, killing protestors, and giving noncitizen immigrants and American citizens alike good reason to fear for their lives. Over the past fourteen months, the Office of the Attorney General has heard from countless Connecticut residents concerned about their safety and that of their neighbors in light of ICE activity in Connecticut and elsewhere. The following is a statement of the policy of the State of Connecticut and the Office of the Attorney General concerning immigration law and related legal matters, proceedings and enforcement actions,” Attorney General Tong states in the memorandum. 

In light of the federal government’s recent actions on immigration, the memorandum from Attorney General Tong to all state officials, public agencies and private organizations articulates and clarifies the State’s policy and legal position regarding immigration matters. This policy includes, but is not limited to, the following:

  • It is the policy of the State of Connecticut to respect, honor and protect immigrants and immigrant families in compliance with state and federal law;
  • the State of Connecticut, including the Office of the Attorney General and other law enforcement agencies, should build trust with immigrants and immigrant communities, and encourage immigrants to trust state officials, law enforcement, and first responders;
  • in accordance with that policy, Office of the Attorney General is deeply committed to safeguarding our community, and respecting, honoring, and protecting Connecticut’s immigrants and immigrant families;
  • all personnel in the Office of the Attorney General are hereby directed to take such actions necessary to implement this policy within our legal authority and in compliance with state and federal law;
  • all legal directors and legal staff throughout state government are hereby directed to consult with the Office of the Attorney General on matters related to immigration law when necessary and appropriate; and
  • through this memorandum, the Office of the Attorney General hereby provides guidance and information about immigration enforcement for state and local governments, and private businesses and organizations.

The memorandum provides general guidance on relevant applicable law. It is not an official opinion of the Attorney General and does not constitute legal advice. The guidance seeks to provide clarity based on the Office of the Attorney General’s analysis but is not a substitute for legal advice specific to a particular set of facts.

Areas of law addressed in the memorandum include:

  • Rescinded federal policies that previously protected against immigration enforcement in sensitive places such as churches, schools and hospitals;
  • Differences between civil immigration laws and criminal statutes;
  • Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures;
  • Distinctions between public places, private places and private places partially open to the public for purposes of Fourth Amendment protections;
  • Limited civil authority of ICE agents to arrest noncitizens;
  • Limited authority of ICE agents to make criminal arrests;
  • Documents granting officers levels of access to people and private spaces, including administrative warrants, administrative detainers, administrative subpoenas, judicial warrants, and judicial subpoenas;
  • Guidance to public agencies and officials regarding information sharing with ICE;
  • Guidance to organizations and entities providing services to immigrants; and
  • Obligations under the Connecticut Trust Act, among other areas.

The memorandum further makes clear that Connecticut is not a “sanctuary state.” “Connecticut is in full compliance with federal law with respect to immigration matters and any claim or suggestion otherwise is false,” the memo states.

The memorandum concludes with a set of frequently asked questions regarding federal immigration enforcement and sample subpoenas, warrants, and enforcement documents.

Special Counsel for Civil Rights Janelle Medeiros assisted the Attorney General in this matter.

Read on CT.gov

Immigrant being arrested / detention-by-ICE

Refugee Detention Policy

English

Jean A. et al v. Noem | Federal Court Order, March 23, 2026

Update: On March 23, 2026, a Federal Court in Massachusetts issued an order in Jean A. et al v. Noem that halts the policy that subjected resettled refugees to arrest and mandatory detention if they had not yet obtained their green cards. This order prevents the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from enforcing the policy while the case proceeds.


IRIS still recommends that refugees remain aware of their surroundings and take precautions when they feel it is necessary. However, refugees should not be at high risk of arrest and detention solely because they do not yet have their green cards.

تازه معلومات: د ۲۰۲۶ کال د مارچ په ۲۳مه، په میساچوسټس ایالت کې یوې فدرالي محکمې د “Jean A. et al v. Noem” په قضیه کې یو حکم صادر کړ چې هغه تګلاره ودروي، د کومې په اساس چې هغه بیا میشت شوي کډوال چې تراوسه يې ګرین کارتونه نه وي اخیستي، د نیولو او جبري توقیف له خطر سره مخامخ کېدل. دا حکم د متحده ایالاتو د کورني امنیت وزارت (DHS) د دې تګلارې له پلي کولو څخه منع کوي ترڅو چې قضیه روانه وي.

IRIS بیا هم وړاندیز کوي چې کډوال خپل چاپیریال ته پام وکړي او چې کله ضروري وبولي، احتیاطي ګامونه پورته کړي. خو، یوازې د دې له امله چې لا ګرین کارت نه لري، کډوالو ته د نیول کېدو ستر خطر نشته .

بهروزرسانی: در تاریخ ۲۳ مارچ ۲۰۲۶، یک دادگاه فدرال در ایالت ماساچوسِت در پروندهی Jean A. و دیگران علیه Noem حکمی صادر کرد که سیاستی را که پناهندگان بازبستهشده راصرفاً به دلیل نداشتن گرین کارتدر معرض دستگیری و بازداشت اجباری قرار میداد، متوقف کرد. این حکم به وزارت امنیت داخلی ایالات متحده (DHS) اجازه نمیدهد که تا زمان رسیدگی به پرونده، این سیاست را اجرا کند.

IRIS همچنان توصیه میکند که پناهندگان به محیط اطراف خود توجه داشته باشند و در صورت نیاز، احتیاط لازم را به عمل آورند. اما پناهندگان تنها به این دلیل که هنوز گرین کارت ندارند، در خطر بالای دستگیری و بازداشت قرار ندارند.

تحديث مهم: في ٢٣ مارس ٢٠٢٦، أصدرت محكمة فيدرالية في ولاية ماساتشوستس حكمًا في قضية جين أ. وآخرين ضد

 نويم، يوقف السياسة التي كانت تُعرِّض اللاجئين المُعادَ توطينهم للاعتقال والاحتجاز الإلزامي بسبب عدم حصولهم على البطاقة الخضراء (Green Card) بعد. ويمنع هذا الحكم وزارة الأمن الداخلي الأمريكية (DHS) من تطبيق هذه السياسة طوال فترة النظر في القضية.

لا تزال منظمة IRIS تنصح اللاجئين بالانتباه إلى محيطهم واتخاذ الاحتياطات اللازمة عند الحاجة. غير أنه لا ينبغي أن يكون اللاجئون في خطر مرتفع من الاعتقال أو الاحتجاز بسبب عدم حصولهم على البطاقة الخضراء فقط.

Actualización: El 23 de marzo de 2026, una Corte Federal en Massachusetts emitió una orden en el caso Jean A. y otros contra Noem, que suspende la política que ponía en riesgo a los refugiados reasentados de ser arrestados y detenidos de manera obligatoria por no contar aún con su Green Card. Esta orden prohíbe al Departamento de Seguridad Nacional (DHS) aplicar dicha política mientras el caso continúa en los tribunales.

IRIS sigue recomendando que los refugiados permanezcan atentos a su entorno y tomen precauciones cuando lo consideren necesario. Sin embargo, los refugiados no deberían enfrentar un alto riesgo de arresto o detención únicamente por no tener todavía su Green Card.

Mizajou: Nan dat 23 mas 2026, yon Tribinal Federal nan Massachusetts pran yon desizyon nan ka Jean A. ak lòt kont Noem, ki sispann règ ki te pèmèt yo arete epi kenbe réfijié yo fòsèman paske yo pa t’ ankò gen Green Card yo. Desizyon sa a anpeche Depatman Sekirite Entèn Etazini (DHS) aplike règ sa a pandan ka a ap kontinye nan tribinal.

IRIS toujou rekòmande pou réfijié yo rete vijilan epi pran prekosyon lè yo santi sa nesesè. Men, réfijié yo pa ta dwe nan gwo risk pou yo arete oswa detni sèlman paske yo poko gen Green Card yo.

Taarifa Mpya: Tarehe 23 Machi 2026, Mahakama ya Shirikisho katika jimbo la Massachusetts ilitoa amri katika kesi ya Jean A. na wengine dhidi ya Noem, ambayo inasimamisha sera iliyokuwa ikiweka wakimbizi waliowekwa upya katika hatari ya kukamatwa na kufungwa lazima kwa sababu hawakuwa bado wamepata Green Card (kibali cha makazi ya kudumu). Amri hii inazuia Idara ya Usalama wa Taifa ya Marekani (DHS) kutekeleza sera hiyo wakati kesi inaendelea mahakamani.

IRIS bado inapendekeza kwamba wakimbizi wawe macho kuhusu mazingira yao na wachukue tahadhari inapohitajika. Hata hivyo, wakimbizi hawapaswi kuwa katika hatari kubwa ya kukamatwa au kufungwa kwa sababu tu hawajapata Green Card yao bado.

Оновлення: 23 березня 2026 року Федеральний суд штату Массачусетс видав ухвалу у справі Джін А. та інших проти Ноем, яка зупиняє дію політики, що піддавала біженців (осіб зі статусом біженця) — які ще не отримали грін-карту — ризику арешту та обов’язкового утримання під вартою. Ця ухвала забороняє Міністерству внутрішньої безпеки США (DHS) застосовувати зазначену політику до завершення розгляду справи.

IRIS як і раніше рекомендує біженцям бути уважними до свого оточення та вживати заходів обережності, коли вони вважають це за потрібне. Водночас, біженці не повинні перебувати під значним ризиком арешту чи затримання лише через те, що вони ще не отримали грін-карту.

Updated February 18, 2026

On February 18, 2026, USCIS and ICE issued a policy memo permitting the arrest and detention of refugees who have been in the U.S. for at least a year and have not yet obtained their Green Cards (Legal Permanent Residence). 

What Does the Memo Require? 

  1. A refugee’s admission into the U.S. is conditional and subject to a mandatory review after one year, and the refugee must “return” or “be returned” to DHS custody for inspection and examination for admission as a green card holder.  DHS has not clearly defined what “return” means. 
  2. If a refugee does not voluntarily return to DHS after one year, then DHS may arrest and detain them. 
  3. Once in custody, the refugee can be held for the entire length of the inspection process. 
  4. If DHS decides the refugee is inadmissible, DHS may start removal or expedited removal proceedings.  

A copy of the full memo can be found here:  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1COk-msHKidjsUAms8g4XdoFnNOFhAMPr/view?usp=drive_link 

 

What is Happening in Court? 

This policy was issued in response to a court case called U.H.A. vs. Bondi. There, the judge issued a temporary order for DHS to stop arresting and detaining certain refugees in Minnesota and to release those already detained. 

A hearing was held on February 19, 2026 to argue whether the temporary order should be extended or terminated, but:  

  1. No ruling was issued, and no timeline was issued for a ruling by the judge;  
  2. The government attorney did not directly say whether DHS would arrest and detain a refugee who had a pending green card application, but they stated they believe DHS can arrest and detain any refugee who does not have a green card on day 366, even if a green card application is pending 

 

What Should Refugees Do Now? 

  1. Refugees who may be affected by this policy are urged to prepare for a possible arrest and detention by DHS. 
  2. Refugees who have not yet applied for their green card (permanent residence) and are eligible should file their application as soon as possible; 
  3. Refugees should also file a FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) Request with USCIS and request their “Entire A-File, including any Form I-590s and transcripts of refugee interviews.”   
    IRAP put together a good explainer here: 
    How can I request a copy of my U.S. refugee application? – IRAP   
  4. Refugees and their families are urged to create a plan to ensure the safety and well-being of family members and children.  
    The CT Governor’s office compiled forms and instructions, and IRIS posted in several languages at Urgent Updates – IRIS-Integrated Refugee & Immigrant Services 
  5. If possible, find and hire an immigration attorney to assist you and/or your family in case of arrest and detention.  

 

Instructions in several languages can be found here:  Urgent Updates – IRIS-Integrated Refugee & Immigrant Services

  في 18 فبراير 2026، أصدرت دائرة خدمات الهجرة والمواطنة الأمريكية (           ) وإدارة الهجرة والجمارك الأمريكية (         ) مذكرة تسمح باعتقال واحتجاز اللاجئين الذين تواجدوا في الولايات المتحدة لمدة عام واحد على الأقل ولم يحصلوا بعد على البطاقة الخضراء (الإقامة الدائمة القانونية او ما تسمى الجرين كارد) 

ما تفرضه هذه المذكرة هو الآتي:

* تعتبرالولايات المتحدة دخول اللاجئ إلى البلاد ميزة مشروطة وتخضع لمراجعة إلزامية بعد مرورعام واحد ويجب على اللاجئ “العودة” او “الاجبار على العودة\الاعادة” الى وصاية وزارة الأمن الداخلي للتفتيش والفحص لغرض قبوله كحامل للبطاقة الخضراء. لم تحدد وزارة الأمن الداخلي الأمريكي بعد بوضوح ما تقصده بوصف كلمة “العودة”.

* إذا لم يعد اللاجئ طواعية إلى وصاية وزارة الأمن الداخلي بعد مرور عام واحد، قد تقوم الوزارة باعتقاله واحتجازه.

* بمجرد وضعه في الحجز، يمكن احتجاز اللاجئ طوال فترة عملية التفتيش.

* إذا قررت وزارة الأمن الداخلي أن اللاجئ غير مقبول، فقد تبدأ إجراءات الترحيل أو الترحيل السريع.

.يمكن العثورعلى نسخة كاملة من المذكرة هنا: رابط المذكرة

 ماذا يحدث في المحكمة؟

صدرت هذه السياسة رداً على قضية في المحكمة تُعرف باسم  

في تلك القضية، أصدر القاضي أمراً مؤقتاً لوزارة الأمن الداخلي بوقف اعتقال واحتجاز بعض اللاجئين في ولاية مينيسوتا وإطلاق سراح من احتجز منهم بالفعل.

في 19 فبراير 2026 عقد جلسة استماع لمناقشة ما إذا كان ينبغي تمديد أمر القاضي أو إنهاؤه, لكن:

* لم يصدر القاضي أي حكم، ولم يتم تحديد جدول زمني لإصدار الحكم

* لم يذكر محامي الحكومة صراحةً ما إذا كانت وزارة الأمن الداخلي ستعتقل وتحتجز اللاجئين الذين لديهم طلبات قيد الانتظار في الحكومة للحصول على الجرين كارد.ومع ذلك، ذكر المحامي أنهم يعتقدون أن لوزارة الأمن الداخلي الحق في اعتقال واحتجاز أي لاجئ لا يملك بطاقة خضراء في اليوم الـ 366 من تواجده في البلاد، حتى لو كان طلب البطاقة الخضراء قيد المراجعة.

ماذا يجب على اللاجئين فعله الآن؟

* يجب على اللاجئون الذين قد يتأثرون بهذه السياسات الاستعداد لاحتمالية التعرض للاعتقال والاحتجاز من قبل وزارة الأمن الداخلي الأمريكي.

* يجب على اللاجئين الموستوفون لشروط التقديم على طلب الجرين الكارد, والذين لم يتقدموا بعد بطلب للحصول على الإقامة الدائمة, تقديم طلباتهم في أسرع وقت ممكن.

   (          ) لطلب “ملف  بموجب قانون حرية (          ), يجب على اللاجئين تقديم طلب إلى دائرة خدمات الهجرة

 .بالكامل, بما في ذلك أي نماذج              ونصوص مقابلات اللاجئين

 من هنا كيف يمكنني طلب نسخة من طلبي للجوء؟.يمكنك الاطلاع على شرح 

 * يجب على اللاجئون وعائلاتهم وضع خطة لضمان سلامة أفراد الأسرة والأطفال.

قام مكتب حاكم ولاية كونيتيكت بتجميع النماذج والتعليمات, ونشرتها منظمة أيريس في هذا الرابط بالأسفل: 

 تحديثات عاجلة – IRIS

 * إن كان ممكناً، ابحث عن محامي هجرة واستعن به لمساعدتك انت وعائلتك احتياطيا في حالة ان تم اعتقال واحتجاز أي فرد من العائلة.

 تحديثات عاجلة – IRISيمكن العثورعلى التعليمات بلغات عدة عبر هذا الرابط 

در تاریخ ۱۸ فوریه ۲۰۲۶، اداره خدمات شهروندی و مهاجرت ایالات متحده (USCIS) و اداره مهاجرت و گمرک (ICE) یادداشتی صادر کردند که بر اساس آن، پناهندگانی که حداقل یک سال در ایالات متحده حضور داشته‌اند و هنوز گرین کارت (اقامت دائم قانونی) دریافت نکرده‌اند،  می‌توانند بازداشت و نگهداری شوند.

این یادداشت چه الزامی ایجاد می‌کند؟

۱-پذیرش یک پناهنده در ایالات متحده مشروط است و پس از یک سال، مشمول بازبینی اجباری می‌شود. پناهنده باید برای بازرسی و بررسی جهت پذیرش به عنوان دارنده گرین کارت، «مراجعه کند» یا «بازگردانده شود» به بازداشت وزارت امنیت داخلی (DHS).وزارت امنیت داخلی به طور شفاف تعریف نکرده است که منظور از «مراجعه» چیست.

۲-اگر پناهنده پس از یک سال به طور داوطلبانه به DHS مراجعه نکند، DHS می‌تواند او را بازداشت و  تحت نظارت نگه دارد.

۳-پس از بازداشت، پناهنده می‌تواند در تمام مدت فرایند بررسی در بازداشت باقی بماند.

۴-اگر DHS تشخیص دهد که پناهنده غیرقابل‌پذیرش است، ممکن است روند اخراج  تسریع‌شده را آغاز کند.

نسخه کامل این یادداشت در لینک زیر موجود است:

[https://drive.google.com/file/d/1COk-msHKidjsUAms8g4XdoFnNOFhAMPr/view?usp=drive_link 

در دادگاه چه اتفاقی در حال وقوع است؟

این سیاست در پاسخ به یک پرونده قضایی با عنوان U.H.A. v. Bondi صادر شد. در این پرونده، قاضی دستور موقتی صادر کرد که بر اساس آن، DHS باید بازداشت و برخی پناهندگان در ایالت مینه‌سوتا را متوقف کرده و افرادی را که قبلاً بازداشت شده‌اند، آزاد کند.

جلسه رسیدگی در تاریخ ۱۹ فوریه ۲۰۲۶ برگزار شد تا درباره تمدید یا لغو دستور موقت تصمیم‌گیری شود، اما هیچ حکمی صادر نشد؛

  1. هیچ جدول زمانی برای صدور رأی توسط قاضی اعلام نشد؛

۲- وکیل دولت به طور مستقیم اعلام نکرد که آیا DHS پناهنده‌ای را که درخواست گرین کارت در حال بررسی دارد بازداشت خواهد کرد یا خیر، اما اظهار داشت که به باور آن‌ها DHS می‌تواند هر پناهنده‌ای را که در روز ۳۶۶ گرین کارت ندارد، بازداشت کند، حتی اگر درخواست گرین کارت او در حال بررسی باشد.

پناهندگان اکنون چه باید بکنند؟

۱-به پناهندگانی که ممکن است تحت تأثیر این سیاست قرار بگیرند، توصیه می‌شود برای احتمال بازداشت و نظارت توسط DHS آماده شوند.

۲- پناهندگانی که هنوز برای گرین کارت (اقامت دائم) اقدام نکرده‌اند و   واجد شرایط هستند، باید هرچه سریع‌تر درخواست خود را ثبت کنند؛

۳- پناهندگان همچنین باید درخواست FOIA (قانون آزادی اطلاعات) را به USCIS ارائه دهند و درخواست «کل پرونده A خود، شامل هرگونه فرم I-590 و رونوشت مصاحبه‌های پناهندگی» را مطرح کنند.

سازمان IRAP توضیح مفیدی در این باره تهیه کرده است:

HHow can I request a copy of my U.S. refugee application? – IRAP   

۴-به پناهندگان و خانواده‌های آنان توصیه می‌شود، برنامه‌ای برای تضمین امنیت و رفاه اعضای خانواده و کودکان تهیه کنند.

دفتر فرماندار ایالت کنتیکت فرم‌ها و دستورالعمل‌هایی را گردآوری کرده است و سازمان IRIS نیز آن‌ها را به چندین زبان منتشر کرده است در:

 Urgent Updates – IRIS-Integrated Refugee & Immigrant Services

در صورت امکان، بهتر است یک وکیل مهاجرت استخدام کنید تا در صورت بازداشتان، به شما و/یا خانواده‌تان کمک کند.

دستورالعمل‌ها به چندین زبان در لینک زیر موجود است:

Urgent Updates – IRIS-Integrated Refugee & Immigrant Services 

۲۰۲۶ کال د فبرورۍ په ۱۸مه، USCIS او ICE یوه پالیسي یادداشت خپور کړ چې له مخې یې هغه کډوال (Refugees) چې لږ تر لږه یو کال په امریکا کې اوسېدلي وي او لا یې شنه کارت (دایمي اقامت) نه وي ترلاسه کړی، نیول او توقیف کېدای شي.

یادداشت څه غواړي؟

۱. د کډوال داخلېدل امریکا ته مشروط دي او له یو کال وروسته لازمي بیاکتنې ته اړتیا لري، او کډوال باید DHS ته “بېرته ورشي” یا د معاینې او شنه کارت د ارزونې لپاره DHS ته وسپارل شي. DHS په روښانه ډول نه ده تعریف کړې چې “بېرته تګ” څه معنا لري.
۲. که کډوال له یو کال وروسته په خپله خوښه DHS ته ورنه شي، DHS کولای شي هغه ونیسي او توقیف یې کړي.
۳. کله چې توقیف شي، کډوال د ارزونې ټول بهیر تر پای پورې ساتل کېدای شي.
۴. که DHS پرېکړه وکړي چې کډوال د داخلېدو وړ نه دی، DHS کولای شي د ایستلو یا چټک ایستلو بهیر پیل کړي    

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1COk-msHKidjsUAms8g4XdoFnNOFhAMPr/view?usp=drive_link      

په محکمه کې څه روان دي؟

دا پالیسي د U.H.A. vs. Bondi په نوم د یوې محکمې د قضیې په غبرګون کې خپره شوې ده. په دې قضیه کې قاضي DHS ته لنډمهاله حکم ورکړ چې په مینیسوټا ایالت کې د ځینو کډوالو نیول او توقیف بند کړي او هغه کسان چې مخکې نیول شوي وو، خوشې کړي.

د ۲۰۲۶ کال د فبرورۍ په ۱۹مه یوه اورېدنه وشوه څو دا وڅېړل شي چې لنډمهاله حکم وغځول شي که پای ته ورسول شي، خو:
۱. هېڅ پرېکړه صادره نه شوه او د پرېکړې لپاره کوم مهال‌وېش هم اعلان نه شو؛
۲. د حکومت وکیل په څرګنده ونه ویل چې ایا DHS به هغه کډوال ونیسي او توقیف کړي چې د شنه کارت غوښتنلیک یې لا تر کار لاندې (pending) وي، خو ویې ویل چې د دوی په باور DHS کولای شي هر هغه کډوال چې د ۳۶۶مې ورځې پورې شنه کارت ونه لري، ونیسي او توقیف یې کړي، حتی که د شنه کارت غوښتنلیک یې لا روان وي.

کډوال اوس څه وکړي؟

۱-هغه کډوال چې ممکن د دې پالیسۍ له اغېزې سره مخ شي، ورته سپارښتنه کېږي چې د DHS لخوا د احتمالي نیولو او توقیف لپاره چمتووالی ونیسي.

۲- هغه کډوال چې لا یې د شنه کارت (دایمي اقامت) غوښتنلیک نه دی ورکړی او وړتیا لري، باید ژر تر ژره خپل غوښتنلیک ثبت کړي.
۳- کډوال باید له USCIS څخه د FOIA (د معلوماتو د ازادۍ قانون) غوښتنه هم وکړي او خپل بشپړ A-File وغواړي، په شمول د I-۵۹۰ فورمونو او د مرکې لیکلي اسنادو. IRAP دا تشریح دلته وړاندې کړې.

 How can I request a copy of my U.S. refugee application? – IRAP   


۴. کډوال او د هغوی کورنۍ دې یو پلان جوړ کړي څو د کورنۍ د غړو او ماشومانو د خوندیتوب او هوساینې ډاډ ترلاسه کړي. د کانیکټیکټ ګورنر دفتر د فورمونو او لارښوونو ټولګه چمتو کړې، او IRIS یې په څو ژبو کې خپره کړې.

Urgent Updates – IRIS-Integrated Refugee & Immigrant Services 

 
۵. که ممکنه وي، د کډوالۍ یو وکیل وګماري څو د نیولو یا توقیف په صورت کې مرسته وکړي.

لارښوونې په څو ژبو کې دلته موندلی شيء :

:  Urgent Updates – IRIS-Integrated Refugee & Immigrant Services 

 

El 18 de febrero de 2026, USCIS e ICE emitieron un memorando de política que autoriza la detención y el arresto de personas refugiadas que hayan permanecido en Estados Unidos al menos un año y que aún no hayan obtenido su Green Card (residencia permanente legal).

¿Qué requiere el memorando?

  1. La admisión de una persona refugiada en Estados Unidos es de carácter condicional y está sujeta a una revisión obligatoria al cumplirse un año. En ese momento, la persona debe “regresar” o “ser devuelta” a la custodia del DHS (Departamento de Seguridad Nacional) para su inspección y evaluación con miras a su admisión como residente permanente legal. El DHS no ha definido con claridad qué significa “regresar”.
  2. Si la persona refugiada no se presenta voluntariamente ante el DHS después de un año, el DHS puede proceder a su arresto y detención.
  3. Una vez bajo custodia, la persona refugiada puede permanecer detenida durante todo el proceso de inspección.
  4. Si el DHS determina que la persona es inadmisible, podrá iniciar un proceso de deportación o un procedimiento de expulsión expedita.

Puede consultarse una copia completa del memorando en el siguiente enlace:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1COk-msHKidjsUAms8g4XdoFnNOFhAMPr/view?usp=drive_link

¿Qué está ocurriendo en los tribunales?

Esta política fue emitida en respuesta a un caso judicial denominado U.H.A. vs. Bondi. En ese asunto, el juez dictó una orden temporal instruyendo al DHS a cesar el arresto y la detención de determinadas personas refugiadas en Minnesota, así como a liberar a quienes ya se encontraban detenidas.

El 19 de febrero de 2026 se celebró una audiencia para determinar si dicha orden temporal debía prorrogarse o dejarse sin efecto; sin embargo:

  1. No se emitió resolución alguna, ni se estableció un plazo para que el juez dicte su decisión;
  2. El abogado del gobierno no indicó de forma directa si el DHS arrestaría y detendría a una persona refugiada con una solicitud de residencia permanente pendiente. No obstante, sostuvo que, a su juicio, el DHS tiene facultad para arrestar y detener a cualquier persona refugiada que no cuente con residencia permanente al día 366, aun cuando tenga una solicitud en trámite.

¿Qué deben hacer ahora las personas refugiadas?

  1. Se recomienda a quienes puedan verse afectadas por esta política que se preparen ante la posibilidad de arresto y detención por parte del DHS.
  2. Aquellas personas que aún no hayan solicitado su residencia permanente (Green Card) y sean elegibles deberían presentar su solicitud a la mayor brevedad posible.
  3. Asimismo, se aconseja presentar una solicitud FOIA (Ley de Libertad de Información) ante USCIS para obtener copia de su expediente completo (“Entire A-File”), incluidos todos los Formularios I-590 y las transcripciones de entrevistas de refugio.

IRAP ha preparado una guía explicativa útil en el siguiente enlace:
¿Cómo puedo solicitar una copia de mi solicitud de refugio en Estados Unidos? – IRAP

  1. Se insta a las personas refugiadas y a sus familias a elaborar un plan que garantice la seguridad y el bienestar de sus familiares y, en particular, de sus hijos e hijas.
    La oficina del Gobernador de Connecticut recopiló formularios e instrucciones, y IRIS publicó información en varios idiomas en: Urgent Updates – IRIS-Integrated Refugee & Immigrant Services
  2. De ser posible, se recomienda buscar y contratar a un abogado de inmigración que pueda brindar asistencia a usted y/o a su familia en caso de arresto y detención.

Puede encontrar instrucciones en varios idiomas en:
Urgent Updates – IRIS-Integrated Refugee & Immigrant Services

Nan dat 18 fevriye 2026, USCIS ak ICE pibliye yon nòt politik ki bay otorizasyon pou arete epi mete an detansyon refijye ki deja pase omwen yon ane Ozetazini epi ki poko jwenn Green Card yo (rezidans pèmanan legal).

Kisa nòt sa a mande?

  1. Lè yon moun antre Ozetazini kòm refijye, estati li pa final; li depann de yon revizyon obligatwa apre li fin fè yon ane. Lè ane a rive, moun nan dwe “retounen” oswa yo ka “fè l retounen” anba gad DHS (Depatman Sekirite Nasyonal) pou yo egzamine dosye li epi verifye si li ka vin rezidan pèmanan legal. DHS pa bay yon definisyon klè sou sa yo vle di lè yo di “retounen”.
  2. Si apre yon ane refijye a pa prezante tèt li devan DHS poukont li, DHS ka arete li epi mete l an detansyon.
  3. Lè moun nan deja anba gad, yo ka kenbe li pandan tout tan pwosesis verifikasyon an ap fèt.
  4. Si DHS deside moun nan pa kalifye pou rete, yo ka lanse pwosedi pou depòte li oswa mete li nan pwosesis depòtasyon rapid.

Ou ka jwenn kopi konplè nòt la nan lyen sa a:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1COk-msHKidjsUAms8g4XdoFnNOFhAMPr/view?usp=drive_link

Kisa k ap pase nan tribinal yo?

Yo mete politik sa a an aplikasyon apre yon dosye nan tribinal ki rele U.H.A. kont Bondi. Nan ka sa a, jij la te bay yon lòd tanporè ki mande DHS pou sispann arete ak detni kèk refijye nan Minnesota, epi pou lage moun ki te deja an detansyon.

Nan dat 19 fevriye 2026, yo te fè yon odyans pou deside si lòd tanporè a ta dwe kontinye oswa anile; men:

  1. Jij la pa t bay okenn desizyon, e li pa t fikse okenn dat pou li anonse desizyon li;
  2. Avoka gouvènman an pa t di klèman si DHS ta arete yon refijye ki gen demann rezidans pèmanan li toujou annatant. Men li te fè konnen, dapre opinyon li, DHS gen dwa arete ak detni nenpòt refijye ki rive nan 366yèm jou a san li poko gen rezidans pèmanan, menm si li deja depoze demann li.

Kisa refijye yo ta dwe fè kounye a?

  1. Yo konseye tout refijye ki ka konsène pa politik sa a pou yo pare tèt yo nan ka ta gen arestasyon oswa detansyon pa DHS.
  2. Moun ki poko depoze demann pou rezidans pèmanan yo (Green Card) epi ki kalifye, ta dwe fè sa pi vit posib.
  3. Yo konseye tou pou fè yon demann FOIA (Lwa sou Libète Enfòmasyon) bay USCIS pou mande kopi dosye imigrasyon konplè yo (“Entire A-File”), ki gen ladan tout Fòm I-590 ak transkripsyon entèvyou refijye yo.

IRAP prepare yon gid itil ki eksplike pwosesis la nan lyen sa a:
Kijan mwen ka mande yon kopi demann refijye mwen Ozetazini? – IRAP

  1. Yo ankouraje refijye yo ak fanmi yo pou yo prepare yon plan pou pwoteje sekirite ak byennèt fanmi an, espesyalman timoun yo.
    Biwo Gouvènè Connecticut la mete ansanm fòm ak enstriksyon, epi IRIS pibliye enfòmasyon nan plizyè lang nan: Urgent Updates – IRIS-Integrated Refugee & Immigrant Services
  2. Si sa posib, li rekòmande pou chèche epi anboche yon avoka imigrasyon ki ka ede ou ak/oswa fanmi ou nan ka ta gen arestasyon oswa detansyon.

Ou ka jwenn enstriksyon nan plizyè lang nan:
Urgent Updates – IRIS-Integrated Refugee & Immigrant Services

Tangazo kuhusu kuwekwa kizuizini kwa wakimbizi

Kwenye Tarehe 18 Februari 2026, offisi ya serekali USCIS na ICE walitoa waraka wa sera unaoruhusu kukamatwa na kufungwa kwa wakimbizi ambao wamekuwa Marekani kwa mwaka mmoja na bado hawajapata Green Card (Makazi ya Kudumu ya Kisheria).

Waraka Unahitaji Nini?

  1. Kuingia kwa mkimbizi nchini Marekani ina tegemea mapitio ya lazima baada ya mwaka mmoja. Mkimbizi lazima “a rudiye” au “a rudishwe” kwenye DHS kwa ajili ya ukaguzi na uchunguzi wa kustahili kupokea hadhi ya mwenye Green Card. DHS bado aja tafusiri maana hakika ya “ku rudiya” 
  2. kama mkimbizi apendi ji toa yeye peke kewnye DHS baada ya mwaka mmoja, basi DHS inaweza kumkamata na kumufunga.
  3. Akiwa chini ya ulinzi, mkimbizi anaweza kushikiliwa kwa muda wote wa mchakato wa ukaguzi.
  4. kama DHS itaamua kwamba mkimbizi hastahili kuingia au kubaki marekani, inaweza kuanza taratibu za kuondolewa nchini au kuondolewa kwa haraka.

waraka kamili inaweza kupatikana hapa:
 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1COk-msHKidjsUAms8g4XdoFnNOFhAMPr/view?usp=drive_link

Nini Kinaendelea Mahakamani (fasi yakusamba) ?

Sera hii ilitolewa kufuatia kesi ya mahakama (corti) iitwayo U.H.A. dhidi ya Bondi. Katika kesi hiyo, jaji alitoa amri ya kuizuia DHS kukamata na kuwaweka kizuizini baadhi ya wakimbizi huko Minnesota, na kuamuru waachiliwe wale waliokwisha kuwekwa kizuizini.

kwenye mahakamani (corti) walifanya kikao tarehe 19 Februari 2026 kuuliza kama wa sukume iyo amri kwenye wakimbizi wote. lakini: 

  1. awake amua kitu yeyote 
  2. serikali hakusema moja kwa moja ikiwa DHS itamkamata na kumweka kizuizini mkimbizi mwenye ombi la Green Card linalosubiri kushughulikiwa, lakini alieleza wanaamini DHS inaweza kukamata na kuweka kizuizini mkimbizi yeyote ambaye hana Green Card siku ya 366, hata kama ombi lake bado linashughulikiwa.

Wakimbizi Wanapaswa Kufanya Nini Sasa?

  1. wakimbizi wenye awana Green Card na walisha kuwa apa marekani kwa mwaka moja, wana itaji kujiandaa kwa uwezekano wa kukamatwa na kuwekwa kizuizini na DHS. 
  2. Wakimbizi ambao bado hawajaomba Green Card (Makazi ya Kudumu) na wanastahili, wanapaswa kuwasilisha maombi yao haraka sana iwezekanavyo;
  3. Wakimbizi wanapaswa pia kuwasilisha ombi la FOIA (Sheria ya Uhuru wa Taarifa) kwa USCIS na kuomba “Faili yao yote ya A-File, ikijumuisha Fomu zozote za I-590 na nakala za mahojiano ya ukimbizi.”

IRAP imeandaa maelezo mazuri hapa:
  Ninawezaje kuomba nakala ya ombi langu la ukimbizi la Marekani? – IRAP

  1. Wakimbizi na familia zao wanahazimishwa kuandaa mpango wa kuhakikisha usalama na ustawi wa wanafamilia na watoto.
     Ofisi ya Muhongozi wa Connecticut na IRIS ina maelekezo muluga mbali mbali:
     Urgent Updates – IRIS-Integrated Refugee & Immigrant Services
  2. Ikiwezekana, tafuta lawyer ya uhamiaji kukusaidia wewe na/au familia yako endapo kutatokea kukamatwa na kuwekwa kizuizini.

Maelekezo katika lugha mingi yanaweza kupatikana hapa:

Urgent Updates – IRIS-Integrated Refugee & Immigrant Services

18 лютого 2026 року USCIS та ICE оприлюднили службовий меморандум, який дозволяє арешт і затримання біженців, що перебувають у США щонайменше один рік і ще не отримали свою Green Card (статус законного постійного мешканця).

Що передбачає меморандум?

  1. В’їзд біженця до США має умовний характер і підлягає обов’язковому перегляду після спливу одного року. Після цього особа повинна «повернутися» або «бути повернутою» під контроль DHS для проходження перевірки та розгляду питання про надання статусу постійного мешканця (Green Card). При цьому DHS не надало чіткого визначення терміна «повернутися».
  2. Якщо біженець не з’явиться до DHS добровільно після одного року перебування, DHS може здійснити його арешт і затримання.
  3. Після взяття під варту біженець може утримуватися протягом усього періоду проведення перевірки.
  4. Якщо DHS визнає особу такою, що не підлягає допуску, відомство може розпочати процедуру видворення або прискореного видворення.

З повним текстом меморандуму можна ознайомитися за посиланням (гіперпосилання збережено):
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1COk-msHKidjsUAms8g4XdoFnNOFhAMPr/view?usp=drive_link

Що відбувається в суді?

Цю політику було запроваджено у відповідь на судову справу U.H.A. vs. Bondi. У межах цієї справи суддя виніс тимчасову ухвалу, якою зобов’язав DHS припинити арешти та затримання окремих біженців у штаті Міннесота, а також звільнити тих, хто вже перебував під вартою.

19 лютого 2026 року відбулося судове засідання, під час якого розглядалося питання про продовження або скасування тимчасової ухвали, однак:

  1. Жодного рішення ухвалено не було, і строки винесення рішення суддею визначені не були;
  2. Представник уряду прямо не повідомив, чи буде DHS здійснювати арешт і затримання біженця, який має на розгляді заяву на отримання Green Card. Водночас він зазначив, що, на його думку, DHS має право арештовувати та затримувати будь-якого біженця, який на 366-й день перебування не має статусу постійного мешканця, навіть якщо його заява ще перебуває на розгляді.

Що слід робити біженцям зараз?

  1. Біженцям, на яких може поширюватися дія цієї політики, рекомендується підготуватися до можливого арешту та затримання з боку DHS.
  2. Біженцям, які ще не подали заяву на отримання Green Card (статусу постійного мешканця) і мають на це право, слід зробити це якомога швидше;
  3. Також рекомендується подати запит відповідно до FOIA (Закону про свободу інформації) до USCIS з проханням надати копію повного імміграційного досьє («Entire A-File, including any Form I-590s and transcripts of refugee interviews.»).

IRAP підготувала детальне роз’яснення за посиланням (гіперпосилання збережено):
How can I request a copy of my U.S. refugee application? – IRAP

  1. Біженцям та їхнім сім’ям рекомендується розробити план дій для забезпечення безпеки та добробуту членів родини, особливо дітей.
    Офіс губернатора штату Коннектикут підготував відповідні форми та інструкції, а IRIS оприлюднила інформацію кількома мовами за посиланням (гіперпосилання збережено): Urgent Updates – IRIS-Integrated Refugee & Immigrant Services
  2. За можливості варто знайти та найняти імміграційного адвоката, який зможе надати допомогу вам та/або вашій родині у разі арешту чи затримання.

Інструкції кількома мовами доступні за посиланням (гіперпосилання збережено):
Urgent Updates – IRIS-Integrated Refugee & Immigrant Services

PUBLISHED BY THE DAY Oct 29, 2025

AG Tong, talking immigration in New London: 'They will make it if we fight for them'

 
tong-speaking-on-immigration

Attorney General William Tong speaks at All Souls Unitarian Universalist Congregation in New London on Wednesday, Oct. 29. The event by Integrated Refugee & Immigrant Services focused on the impact of President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown. (Alison Cross/The Day)

By Alison Cross
Day Staff Writer
 
New London — State Attorney General William Tong visited the city Monday evening to share a message of hope and resistance amid President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown.
The event at All Souls Unitarian Universalist Congregation was organized by Integrated Refugee & Immigrant Services, the New Haven-based nonprofit known as IRIS.
Since 1982, IRIS has welcomed and resettled thousands of refugees and immigrants within the state, but Maggie Mitchell Salem, the organization’s executive director, said new federal policies have upended longstanding pathways to legal immigration.
As a result of these changes, Mitchell Salem said IRIS will not participate in the U.S. government-supported refugee admissions program for the first time in the nonprofit’s history, starting on Jan. 1. Mitchell Salem said IRIS will continue to resettle refugees from Afghanistan and other countries without federal funding.
During his speech, Tong described the Trump administration’s policies and actions over the last nine months as “awful, brutal, (and) painful.” Tong spoke about lawsuits he has filed against the federal government to block the Trump administration from ending birthright citizenship and coercing states into following the administration’s immigration agenda.
Tong said people often put refugees and immigrants into separate categories but “very often they’re one and the same.”
“My grandparents and my dad ran for their lives (from China),” Tong said. “I’m a kid that comes from refugees and immigrants. I grew up in a Chinese restaurant. … If you go to a takeout joint around here and you see a high schooler ring up your Tuesday night takeout, that was me.”
“In one generation, I went from that hot Chinese restaurant kitchen in the state of Connecticut in Wethersfield, to being the 25th attorney general of the state,” Tong continued. “I don’t tell you that story because it’s a good story, I tell you that story because it is an unremarkable story. It is a story shared by so many people. And there are kids right now, our kids in this city, the sons and daughters and grandchildren of refugees and immigrants who are just like us … and I know they will make it if we fight for them right now.”
Maryam Elahi, the president and chief executive officer of the Community Foundation of Eastern Connecticut, said that right now, children are not getting an education because “so many parents are terrified to take their kids to school (and) pick them up.”
“This is not acceptable,” Elahi said.
Elahi encouraged people to reframe the way they speak about immigrants.
“Unless you’re a Native American, you’re an immigrant in this country,” she said. “Some of us came earlier on boats. Some of us came later by foot or plane or both, but the end result is the same. It’s really important for all of us to change the narrative, to talk about immigrants as all of us, to talk about immigrants as people who bring so much richness to our community and to put our arms around them.”
Jeanne Milstein, the human services director for the city, said that New London’s history is rooted in immigrant communities who have made the city stronger.
“It is our diversity which is our strength. New London is a seaport town. It has always been a rich mix of people. It is a community where everyone is welcome,” Milstein said. “The feds may be trying to kill the American dream, but here in New London, it is alive and well.”

PUBLISHED BY THE HARTFORD COURANT

After four decades, CT organization won’t resettle refugees this year. Here’s why

For the first time in more than four decades Integrated Refugee & Immigrant Services made the decision to not resettle refugees through the United States Refugee Admissions program, due to the Trump administration’s intent to shift the program’s focus.
“We will not resettle populations that aren’t refugees,” said Maggie Mitchell Salem, director of IRIS. “That is basically the point. This is not about Afrikaners or right wing groups in Europe. This is not about ideology or politics. This is about our mission. Our mission is to resettle the world’s most vulnerable people who have been screened for the credible fear they possess which keeps them from going home.”
Mitchell Salem added: “We are not a relocation service. We work with and for a very specific population and as part of the humanitarian pathway within this immigration system.”
The New York Times reported Wednesday that the Trump administration “is considering a radical overhaul of the U.S. refugee system that would slash the program to its bare bones while giving preference to English speakers, white South Africans and Europeans who oppose migration.” 
The Trump administration has said that white South African farmers face discrimination and violence at home, which the country’s government strongly denies.
The IRIS board made the decision last month to change course after learning about the Trump’s administration’s plans to change the refugee program, including limiting the number of refugees to 30,000 to 40,000, Mitchell Salem said.
“That only reinforced that decision,” Mitchell said. “We have never had to question the U.S. government’s decision. This is not about who is in charge of our government. We have supported refugee resettlement in Republican administrations, and Democratic administrations without fail. We had to do some critical thinking about whether based on what we understood to be the administration’s policy on the U.S. refugee program, whether there was an alignment between our mission and how they were implementing the program.”
The Church World Service, which IRIS is an affiliate of, and contracts with the State Department to help refugees “expressed its dismay and deep concern in response to the Trump administration’s plans to reduce the refugee admissions’ goal “to the lowest level in history,” according to a press release from the agency.
New numbers reported from the Associated Press suggest the Trump administration is considering admitting far fewer refugees than IRIS had initially learned, with just 7,500 admitted.
Dana Bucin, an immigration attorney and partner with Harris Beach Murtha in Hartford, said the administration’s ban against refugees at the beginning of 2025 is not advisable.
“The entire policy that is against refugees in particular is harmful at a time when the world is seeing a record number of refugees due to wars, civil wars, famine, climate change and a bunch of other factors,” she said. “We have never had so many refugees as we do now and so few tools to deal with them and so definitely in general an anti-refugee policy is not conducive to humanitarian endeavors.”
Bucin said she does not believe that all Afrikaners qualify as a group for refugee status.
“But as attorneys we are open to hearing of any individualized case of persecution for Afrikaners, much like anyone else,” she said.
Since the Trump administration suspended the refugee program in January, IRIS relocated its New Haven office and had to shut its Hartford office.
In fiscal year 2024, IRIS served more than 2,000 people and resettled 900 refugees.
In fiscal year 2025 they were planning to resettle 800 refugees but have only been able to settle 241 refugees as many were denied entry or delayed.
As a result of the suspension of the refugee program, IRIS lost about $4 million in funding and had to lay off employees.
In the United States, some 128,000 refugees have currently been approved for resettlement in the United States and are now stuck in limbo, said Mark Hetfield, president of HIAS, the Jewish refugee resettlement agency. In addition, 14,000 Jews, Christians and other religious minorities in Iran have long been registered with the refugee program.
New vision
IRIS is not suspending its activities though. The organization is realigning its focus to help refugees and immigrants with assistance securing housing, food, addressing health issues and advocating for more English Language Learning programs to help them succeed in the workforce, Mitchell Salem said.
Mitchell Salem said she is concerned about provisions in Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill particularly eliminating SNAP for refugees. She said IRIS needs more support to provide basic proteins for refugees in its food pantry.
Targeting ELL programs aligned to workforce development programs is critical, she said, so “people are getting the right vocational training and entering these programs successfully and entering higher paying jobs in the healthcare, hospitality and manufacturing sector. This is a win for the state. The state has to become more competitive.”
Mitchell Salem said IRIS will focus on deepening partnerships with the Chambers of Commerce and workforce boards and adult literacy organizations that exist in every town and city in the state.
In addition to those being barred from entering the country, Mitchell Salem said immigrants who are here are being terrorized. Calling it inhumane, Mitchell Salem said rounding up of people in the community at their place of employment is having an impact on everyone.
“It is going to impact the price of food and whether your grandmother is being taken care of in an assisted living community,” she said. “It is impacting employers. It is impacting tax bases. You don’t remove this significant number of people from our community and have no impact.”
With ICE arrests continuing in Connecticut and immigrant advocates calling for state officials to act, lawmakers are in discussions about increasing legal protections during an upcoming special session.
ICE agents stormed a Hamden car wash Wednesday and detained and took away eight people including a husband and wife and a customer, according to information from state Sen. Jorge Cabrera’s office.
“Since we passed the TRUST Act a decade ago, Connecticut has always carved out exceptions for dangerous felons,” Cabrera said in a statement. ”Democrats don’t have a problem with that. Neither does the governor. What we do have a problem with is Donald Trump and ICE telling us that they are arresting the scum of the Earth – murderers and gang members and pedophiles. And then who do they arrest? Landscapers. Dishwashers. High school kids. People working at car washes.”
The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Originally Published: 

October 17, 2025 at 5:37 AM ED