Overview
This paper outlines how states can reduce immigration detention by prohibiting local governments and agencies from entering into contracts with federal authorities for detention services.
Key Points
- States can restrict participation in detention by banning local contracts with federal agencies
- Immigration detention heavily relies on agreements with state and local entities
- Reducing these contracts can limit detention capacity nationwide
- Policies can be designed to comply with federal law while limiting state involvement
Why This Matters
State-level policy decisions can play a significant role in shaping how immigration enforcement operates on the ground, even when federal authority remains in place.
Examples / Context
- States like California and New Jersey have passed laws limiting or banning certain detention contracts
- These policies aim to reduce reliance on local facilities for federal detention operations

